At first sight, taking
the measures to expand gun control or making the gun use illegal may be seen as
a logical decision. The people whose children were killed in an attack may
strictly want to abolish the right to have guns because they may express their
thoughts based on their emotions. However, the opponents of the gun control in
the Senate of America rejected the measures to expand the gun control. Although
some proponents for the gun control are angry or sad about the decision, it is
more logical for some reasons in my opinion.
First of all, restrictions for
guns may make the use of the guns attractive. According to the research, when
Americans learned that the government may take some measures to expand the gun
control, the rate of gun sales reached at the record level. Unlike the popular belief, this obviously shows
us that only the possibility of restrictions for guns made the sales of the
guns increase. As for background checks, there are already some checks in
America, but the criminals or insane people do not obey them. When the
background checks are stricter than now, there will be no change for them at all.
The strict checks will just lead to have guns harder for the victims. Any restrictions
for gun just make victims vulnerable.
Secondly,
people need to protect themselves, and they can do this thanks to guns like
handguns and the possibility of carrying guns. When the criminals have a gun,
the victims cannot protect themselves through anything else except for guns. If
the victims have handguns, they can be in a better position. It is almost
impossible to take all the guns from all the criminals back or prevent them
from taking guns, so the best solution may be to help victims to take and carry
guns. The possibility or suspect of carrying guns may also protect victims. If
a criminal does not know whether the victim has a gun or not, then the criminal
has to think twice before he attacks to the victim. For example, a woman who is
outside at night for any reason may be comfortable thanks to her gun and the
criminal who intends to attack or assault to her dare not to do this just because
he is not sure about whether she can defend herself or not. Not only guns but
also the possibility of carrying them may protect victims especially women better
than anything else even laws.
All in
all, instead of the expanding gun control, the government should encourage the
citizens to have and carry concealed guns. Restrictions for guns do not
decrease the crime rate. On the contrary, they just increase crimes and give
advantages to criminals. The guns and the possibility of carrying guns are a
better protector than laws in my opinion. Therefore, in order to protect
ourselves, we need to carry guns regardless of the claims of the proponents of
the gun control.
Dear Zahide,
YanıtlaSilThis topic is very sensitive. As a susceptible person, I'm also interested in this topic. However, I have ideas which are contrast to your opinions, but it is not important. You told us your thoughts in a very fluent way.
Thank you for your journal :)